Patent Planet

Friday, August 24, 2012

Apple v. Samsung - Samsung Infringes Apple Patents

Wired: Jury Rules Samsung Violated Apple Patents

Ars Technica: Apple v. Samsung verdict is in: $1 billion loss for Samsung

CNET: Apple v. Samsung Verdict Live

The Verge: Live: Apple vs. Samsung: jury decision

Copyright © 2012 Robert Moll. All rights reserved.
Labels: Apple, design patents, jury, Samsung, software patents, trial practice Posted by Robert Moll at 4:10 PM
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Newer Post Older Post Home

Search This Blog

Contact Info

Robert Moll
Tel 650-888-3093
Email rgmoll@patentplanet.com

Follow @patentplanet
View Robert Moll's Linkedin profile



Representative Patents and Applications




Categories

  • 35 US 145 (1)
  • 35 USC 101 (83)
  • 35 USC 102 (15)
  • 35 USC 103 (10)
  • 35 USC 112 (13)
  • 35 USC 115 (2)
  • 35 USC 118 (1)
  • 35 USC 120 (1)
  • 35 USC 122 (1)
  • 35 USC 135 (1)
  • 35 USC 141 (2)
  • 35 USC 145 (1)
  • 35 USC 271 (6)
  • 35 USC 284 (2)
  • 35 USC 285 (7)
  • 35 USC 286 (1)
  • 35 USC 287 (2)
  • 35 USC 311 (1)
  • 35 USC 314 (3)
  • 35 USC 315 (4)
  • 35 USC 325 (1)
  • 3D printing (1)
  • ABA (1)
  • abandonment (2)
  • abstract idea (9)
  • academic papers (37)
  • admissions (1)
  • ADS (3)
  • AFCP 2.0 (3)
  • after final practice (6)
  • agreements (1)
  • AI (5)
  • AIA (118)
  • AIA Trials (13)
  • AIPLA (3)
  • AIR (1)
  • Alice (5)
  • allowance (1)
  • Amazon (2)
  • amendment (1)
  • America Invents Act (94)
  • American Invents Act (1)
  • amicus briefs (1)
  • android (7)
  • anticipation (1)
  • antitrust (16)
  • AOC (1)
  • APA (1)
  • API (1)
  • APIs (4)
  • Appeal (9)
  • appeals (3)
  • Apple (58)
  • application data sheet (4)
  • artificial intelligence (5)
  • assignments (4)
  • assignor estoppel (5)
  • attorney fees (13)
  • authentication (1)
  • bankruptcy (3)
  • BCLT (1)
  • Beats (1)
  • biking (1)
  • Bill Gates (1)
  • Bilski (1)
  • biotech (1)
  • Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (5)
  • BPAI (4)
  • BRI (2)
  • broadest reasonable interpretation (1)
  • burgers (1)
  • business method patents (22)
  • business method review (3)
  • CAFC (5)
  • CBM (9)
  • certificate of mailing (1)
  • China (8)
  • citation of prior art and written statements (1)
  • claim construction (15)
  • claims (3)
  • clear and convincing; IPR; PREVAIL Act; preponderance; standard of proof; burden of proof (1)
  • cloud (1)
  • complaints (2)
  • computer readable medium (1)
  • computer security (1)
  • conflict of interest (1)
  • Congress (12)
  • contingency fee (2)
  • continuation (2)
  • contract (1)
  • copyright (32)
  • copyrightability (2)
  • costs (1)
  • covered business method (18)
  • crowdsourcing (3)
  • damages (23)
  • declaratory relief (4)
  • demand letter (1)
  • deposition (1)
  • derivation (9)
  • design patents (28)
  • designing around (2)
  • direct infringement (1)
  • discovery (7)
  • dismissal (1)
  • dismissal with prejudice (2)
  • divisional (1)
  • DOCX (4)
  • DOJ (2)
  • domestic industry (1)
  • double patenting (1)
  • Doug Engelbart (1)
  • duty of disclosure (2)
  • Eastern District of Texas (2)
  • EBay (1)
  • EBC (3)
  • EFF (1)
  • EFS (9)
  • EFS; Patent Center; Private PAIR; USPTO (1)
  • Electronic Business Center (2)
  • employee mobility (1)
  • en banc (1)
  • enforcement (1)
  • EPO (9)
  • equitable estoppel (2)
  • estoppel (5)
  • ethics (6)
  • Europe (5)
  • evidence (1)
  • ex parte appeals (2)
  • ex parte reexamination (16)
  • examination (38)
  • examiners (5)
  • expedited examination (2)
  • expert testimony (1)
  • Facebook (2)
  • fair use (6)
  • fax (1)
  • Federal Circuit (61)
  • Federal Circuit Rules (2)
  • Federal government (2)
  • Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (3)
  • fees (24)
  • financial product or service (1)
  • Fintive (1)
  • firewalls (1)
  • First Amendment (1)
  • first sale (1)
  • first-inventor-to-file (6)
  • first-to-file (5)
  • first-to-invent (1)
  • foreign patents (21)
  • forms (1)
  • FRAND (15)
  • free riding (1)
  • FTC (9)
  • generic (1)
  • Germany (1)
  • glossary (1)
  • Google (36)
  • grace period (4)
  • Hague Agreement (3)
  • harmonization (4)
  • Harvard JOLT (1)
  • hearings (3)
  • HR 6621 (1)
  • HTC (3)
  • Iancu (1)
  • IBM (6)
  • IDS (2)
  • IEEE (1)
  • iIPR (1)
  • indefiniteness (5)
  • inducement (6)
  • infringement (17)
  • injunctive relief (11)
  • innovation (18)
  • Innovation Act (1)
  • insurance (1)
  • intellectual property (3)
  • Intellectual Ventures (5)
  • inter partes reexamination (9)
  • inter partes review (87)
  • Internet (1)
  • intervening rights (1)
  • interviews (5)
  • Invalidity (5)
  • invention (6)
  • inventor (4)
  • inventor declarations (6)
  • inventorship (6)
  • IP (2)
  • IP WatchDog (1)
  • IP5 (1)
  • IPO (2)
  • IPR (38)
  • Israel (1)
  • ITC (14)
  • Java (14)
  • joinder (2)
  • joint infringement (5)
  • JPO (1)
  • Judge Rich (1)
  • jurisdiction (1)
  • jury (6)
  • KIPO (1)
  • laches (6)
  • lapse (1)
  • law reviews (4)
  • legal scholarship (2)
  • license (1)
  • licensing (12)
  • maintenance fees (4)
  • Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (4)
  • marking (7)
  • Mayo (2)
  • means-plus-function claims (6)
  • method claims (1)
  • Michelle Lee (1)
  • micro entity (5)
  • Microsoft (11)
  • military (1)
  • mistrial (1)
  • mobile computing patent wars (44)
  • motion to amend claims (6)
  • Motorola (8)
  • MPEP (7)
  • new ground of rejection (2)
  • new matter (1)
  • Nokia (4)
  • non-assert clause (1)
  • non-practicing entities (14)
  • nonprovisionals (1)
  • notice letter (1)
  • novelty (3)
  • NPE (18)
  • NTP (1)
  • oath or declaration (2)
  • Obama administration (2)
  • obviousness (10)
  • on sale bar (5)
  • one-year bar (1)
  • open source (11)
  • or business method review (1)
  • Oracle (5)
  • Oracle-Google (4)
  • ownership (12)
  • PACER (1)
  • PAE (12)
  • PAIR (9)
  • patent (3)
  • patent aggregators (1)
  • patent aggregators (6)
  • patent assertion entities (16)
  • patent bullying (1)
  • Patent Center; USPTO (1)
  • patent demands (1)
  • patent eligibility (79)
  • patent exhaustion (2)
  • patent hold up (1)
  • patent ineligibility (1)
  • patent law (3)
  • Patent Law Treaty (1)
  • patent license (3)
  • patent licensing (35)
  • patent litigation (160)
  • patent misuse (1)
  • patent monetization (6)
  • patent monetizers (13)
  • patent prosecution (7)
  • Patent Prosecution Highway (1)
  • patent purchase (3)
  • patent purchasing (16)
  • patent quality (8)
  • patent reform (19)
  • patent sale (9)
  • patent strategy (33)
  • patent term (4)
  • patent term adjustment (1)
  • Patent Trial and Appeal Board (15)
  • Patent Trial Appeal Board (2)
  • patent troll (28)
  • patent trolls (26)
  • patent venue (3)
  • Patentability search (1)
  • patents (22)
  • Patents Dashboard (1)
  • PCT (6)
  • PDF (1)
  • pendency (1)
  • petitions (2)
  • PGR (6)
  • pilot (1)
  • PLT (1)
  • post grant review (11)
  • post-grant proceedings (17)
  • post-grant review (28)
  • power of attorney (1)
  • pre-issuance submissions (3)
  • preamble (2)
  • preissuance submissions (7)
  • prior art (11)
  • prior user rights (2)
  • prioritized examination (3)
  • priority (1)
  • privilege (1)
  • product-by-process (1)
  • provisionals (7)
  • PRPS (1)
  • PTAB (95)
  • PTAB E2E (2)
  • PTO (62)
  • PTO interviews (4)
  • public dedication (1)
  • public interest (1)
  • public use (2)
  • Qualcomm (6)
  • RCE (1)
  • real party in interest (7)
  • reasonable royalty (12)
  • reexamination (12)
  • reissue (2)
  • remedies (5)
  • request continued examination (1)
  • restriction (1)
  • revival (1)
  • RIM (2)
  • Rockstar (1)
  • royalty stacking (1)
  • RPX (5)
  • Rule 11 (1)
  • Rule 130 declaration (1)
  • Samsung (31)
  • satellite office (7)
  • SAWS (2)
  • search (10)
  • self driving cars (1)
  • Sensitive Application Warning System (1)
  • SEP (15)
  • separation of powers (1)
  • sequestration (3)
  • served (1)
  • service mark (1)
  • settlement (9)
  • SHIELD Act (1)
  • Silicon Valley (6)
  • SIPO (1)
  • SIR (1)
  • small entity (3)
  • software (1)
  • software patents (140)
  • Sonos (1)
  • standard essential patents (12)
  • standard of review (3)
  • standing (1)
  • startups (23)
  • statutory invention registrations (1)
  • stay (4)
  • Steve Jobs (3)
  • substantial rights (1)
  • supplemental examination (6)
  • Supreme (1)
  • Supreme Court (8)
  • system maintenance (1)
  • territoriality (2)
  • TMEP (1)
  • Track One (1)
  • trade secret (6)
  • trademark (10)
  • Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (3)
  • transparency (1)
  • Treaty (1)
  • trial (5)
  • trial practice (7)
  • TTAB (2)
  • Twitter (2)
  • Uber (1)
  • UCC (1)
  • US patent law (15)
  • US Patents (11)
  • US Supreme Court (49)
  • USC (1)
  • USPTO (237)
  • utility patents (3)
  • VC (1)
  • venture capital (2)
  • venue (1)
  • VirnetX (1)
  • virtual marking (2)
  • wearable computing (1)
  • Web (4)
  • White House (1)
  • willful infringement (3)
  • WIPO (1)
  • wireless (3)
  • World Intellectual Property Organization (1)
  • written description (3)
  • Yahoo (2)
  • Zackees (1)

Blog Archive

  • January (1)
  • December (1)
  • November (2)
  • March (2)
  • December (1)
  • February (1)
  • January (1)
  • December (2)
  • October (1)
  • September (1)
  • June (2)
  • May (1)
  • December (2)
  • October (4)
  • September (4)
  • August (3)
  • July (6)
  • June (6)
  • May (4)
  • April (5)
  • March (4)
  • February (4)
  • January (4)
  • December (4)
  • November (4)
  • October (2)
  • September (2)
  • August (4)
  • July (5)
  • June (3)
  • May (1)
  • April (3)
  • March (3)
  • February (1)
  • January (12)
  • December (15)
  • November (7)
  • October (1)
  • September (1)
  • August (4)
  • June (3)
  • April (2)
  • February (2)
  • January (5)
  • December (5)
  • November (9)
  • October (1)
  • August (1)
  • July (1)
  • May (3)
  • March (5)
  • January (1)
  • December (6)
  • November (9)
  • October (17)
  • August (3)
  • July (5)
  • June (3)
  • May (4)
  • April (4)
  • March (2)
  • February (9)
  • January (2)
  • December (3)
  • November (13)
  • October (4)
  • September (5)
  • August (8)
  • July (8)
  • June (8)
  • May (8)
  • April (10)
  • March (10)
  • February (11)
  • January (13)
  • December (17)
  • November (23)
  • October (22)
  • September (22)
  • August (23)
  • June (7)
  • May (13)
  • April (15)
  • March (16)
  • February (15)
  • January (15)
  • December (16)
  • November (8)
  • October (10)
  • September (10)
  • August (11)
  • July (10)
  • June (12)
  • May (13)
  • April (11)
  • March (10)
  • February (10)
  • January (12)
  • December (12)
  • November (10)
  • October (11)
  • September (10)
  • August (14)
  • July (24)
  • June (20)
  • May (27)
  • April (29)
  • March (28)
  • February (11)
  • January (16)
  • December (9)
  • November (1)

Legal Notice

This blog is for general information only. It is not legal advice, solicitation or advertising. Even if it appears relevant to your situation, do not rely on it. Instead, promptly seek the advice of a patent attorney. It may or may not reflect the latest legal development or apply to your situation. Patent Planet disclaims liability for any action taken or omitted based on the information in this blog.
Powered by Blogger.