In August 2015, the USPTO notified PAIR unavailable 04:30 AM to 05:30 AM ET daily.
Copyright © 2015 Robert Moll. All rights reserved.
Saturday, August 29, 2015
Friday, August 28, 2015
USPTO - New Patents Petitions Timeline Now Available
On August 26, the USPTO notified:
"The Office of Petitions has launched a new USPTO
Patents Petitions Timeline that provides information on petition types that
can be filed throughout each stage of the patent prosecution process. For each
petition type, users can easily access information on average pendency over the
past 12 months of decided petitions, the deciding office, petition grant rates,
and link to specific sections of the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure
(MPEP) or other parts of the USPTO website that relate to each petition type.
The Patents Petitions Timeline website was developed
to help our customers access more detailed statistics, including grant and
pendency rates, and useful information about each petition. This will help
applicants make better quality decisions on when to file a particular petition
type during prosecution or for the life of the issued patent.
Please visit the USPTO's USPTO
Patents Petitions Timeline found on http://www.uspto.gov/patents-application-process/petitions/timeline/uspto-petitions-timeline."
Copyright © 2015 Robert Moll. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2015 Robert Moll. All rights reserved.
USPTO - New Patent Maintenance Fees Storefront Now Available
On August 28, the USPTO notified:
Patent Maintenance Fees Storefront - http://www.uspto.gov/learning-and-resources/fees-and-payment/patent-maintenance-fees-storefront
Frequently Asked Questions - http://www.uspto.gov/learning-and-resources/fees-and-payment/online-fee-payment-tools-faqs
Fee Payment System Customer Survey Highlights - http://www.uspto.gov/learning-and-resources/fees-and-payment/transition-resources"
Copyright © 2015 Robert Moll. All rights reserved.
"New information about the USPTO’s upcoming
release of the Patent
Maintenance Fees Storefront is now available online. We’ve also published a
list of Frequently
Asked Questions that provides further details about this new online fee
payment tool. It includes information about the USPTO’s new online shopping
cart, which will be available in the Patent Maintenance Fees Storefront.
If you haven’t done so already, check out the Fee
Payment System Customer Survey Highlights to see how your input has helped
us design our newest online fee payment tools.
If you have questions or feedback about the
Patent Maintenance Fees Storefront, send an email to fpng@uspto.gov. Your input continues to drive
our plans for future systems and your question could appear on our Frequently
Asked Questions page.
Having trouble using the in-text hyperlinks? You can copy and paste
these URLS to your web browser:Patent Maintenance Fees Storefront - http://www.uspto.gov/learning-and-resources/fees-and-payment/patent-maintenance-fees-storefront
Frequently Asked Questions - http://www.uspto.gov/learning-and-resources/fees-and-payment/online-fee-payment-tools-faqs
Fee Payment System Customer Survey Highlights - http://www.uspto.gov/learning-and-resources/fees-and-payment/transition-resources"
Copyright © 2015 Robert Moll. All rights reserved.
Sunday, August 23, 2015
PTAB - Amendments to the Rules of Practice for Trials Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board
On August 20, 2015, the USPTO published Amendments to the Rules of Practice for Trials Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
As stated in the Federal Register, this proposed rule would amend the existing consolidated set of rules relating to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (Office) trial practice for inter partes (IPR), the transitional program for covered business method patents (CBM), and derivation proceedings that implemented provisions of the Leahy Smith America Invents Act (AIA) providing for trials before the Office.
Copyright © 2015 Robert Moll. All rights reserved.
As stated in the Federal Register, this proposed rule would amend the existing consolidated set of rules relating to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (Office) trial practice for inter partes (IPR), the transitional program for covered business method patents (CBM), and derivation proceedings that implemented provisions of the Leahy Smith America Invents Act (AIA) providing for trials before the Office.
Copyright © 2015 Robert Moll. All rights reserved.
Saturday, August 22, 2015
San Jose Mercury News - Apple v. Samsung: Court Rejects Latest Appeal
If you are interested on the latest on the Apple and Samsung patent infringement battle, the San Jose Mercury News reports Apple v. Samsung: Court Rejects Latest Appeal.
Copyright © 2015 Robert Moll. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2015 Robert Moll. All rights reserved.
Tuesday, August 18, 2015
Federal Circuit - Akamai v. Limelight - Joint Infringement of Method Claim
In US patent law the standard of joint infringement of method claims seems to be shifting in recent years. Although not a lengthy decision on August 13, 2015, in Akamai Technologies v. Limelight Network, the Federal Circuit made it easier to prove joint infringement.
The Federal Circuit began in safe territory by stating: "direct infringement under occurs where all steps of a claimed method are performed by or attributable to a single entity." The Federal Circuit stated if "more than one actor is involved in practicing the steps, a court must determine whether the acts of one are attributable to the other such that a single entity is responsible for the infringement. When should it be attributable? The Federal Circuit says we will hold an entity responsible for others’ performance of method steps in two sets of circumstances: (1) where that entity directs or controls others’ performance, and (2) where the actors form a joint enterprise, and not just when we have a principle-agency relationship or a contract between the actors.
Copyright © 2015 Robert Moll. All rights reserved.
The Federal Circuit began in safe territory by stating: "direct infringement under occurs where all steps of a claimed method are performed by or attributable to a single entity." The Federal Circuit stated if "more than one actor is involved in practicing the steps, a court must determine whether the acts of one are attributable to the other such that a single entity is responsible for the infringement. When should it be attributable? The Federal Circuit says we will hold an entity responsible for others’ performance of method steps in two sets of circumstances: (1) where that entity directs or controls others’ performance, and (2) where the actors form a joint enterprise, and not just when we have a principle-agency relationship or a contract between the actors.
Copyright © 2015 Robert Moll. All rights reserved.
Wednesday, August 12, 2015
Professor Peter Mennel et al. - Patent Case Management Judical Guide - New Third Edition
Professor Peter Mennel of UC Berkeley Law School published a new third edition of the Patent Case Management Judical Guide. I am just starting to read it this week, but based on my experience with previous editions expect this 1321-page Guide is again a valuable detailed description of US patent litigation. Part of the strength is it is based on contributions from leading practitioners and patent academics. It's amazingly a free PDF download which should prove valuable to attorneys and judges in the patent litigation trenches.
Copyright © 2015 Robert Moll. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2015 Robert Moll. All rights reserved.
Tuesday, August 4, 2015
USPTO - Windows 10/Microsoft Edge: Compatibility Issue for EFS-Web and Private PAIR Authentication
Today, the USPTO announced "For users who are updating their operating
systems to Windows 10, please be aware that Windows 10 comes installed with a
new web browser, Microsoft Edge, that does not support plug-ins and will not
run Java. Because Java is required for authentication to EFS-Web and Private
PAIR, this impacts your ability to access EFS-Web and Private PAIR via
Microsoft Edge.
To access EFS-Web and Private PAIR using
Windows 10, Oracle is recommending the use of alternative browsers such as
Firefox and Internet Explorer. IE11 will also be available on Windows 10. For
additional information regarding Java compatibility and instructions on how to
access IE11 on Windows 10, please visit: http://www.java.com/en/download/faq/win10_faq.xml
The USPTO is working on a longer term plan to
improve the overall authentication process. For USPTO updates regarding this
issue please visit either of our Announcements pages:
•
EFS – Web Announcements: http://www.uspto.gov/patents-application-process/applying-online/efs-web-announcements
•
PAIR Announcements: http://www.uspto.gov/patents-application-process/checking-application-status/pair-announcements
If you need assistance with this matter, or
have questions on any eFiling topic, please visit the Patent Electronic
Business Center webpage: http://www.uspto.gov/learning-and-resources/support-centers/patent-electronic-business-center
for comprehensive contact information, FAQ’s, and other eFiling resources."
Copyright © 2015 Robert Moll. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2015 Robert Moll. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)